Re: Kracht group comet 2021-10-17 = 342P ?
Robert Pickard
Yeah, looks like 342P SOHO
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021, 7:49 AM Worachate <worachateb@...> wrote: As expected.
|
|
Re: Kracht group comet 2021-10-17 = 342P ?
Worachate
As expected.
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images. (0,0) Upper Left. 2021-10-17 Kracht group comet. 0312 810 478 ... 0724 997 437 0736 1005 435 0748 1014 433 I'm going to estimate that perihelion occurs around 2021 October 17.8 UTC or 0.5-1.0 day earlier than predicted. Regards, Worachate Boonplod
|
|
Kracht group comet 2021-10-17 = 342P ?
Worachate
Hello all,
I'm detecting a moving object in C3 that may be the return of 342P/SOHO. Images: C3; 1024x1024 images. (0,0) Upper Left. 2021-10-17 0954 641 467 1006 643 467 1018 645 467 1042 648 466 1054 650 466 1106 652 465 If it is 342P, the comet has arrived earlier than expected. It should appear in C2 in delayed data soon. Regards, Worachate Boonplod
|
|
Re: New report
Michał Biesiada
Retracting
|
|
New report
Michał Biesiada
Hi All,
New comet report: 21-10-16 Upper Left, 1024x1024, c2 856 936 16:00 848 924 16:12 842 910 16:24 Best wishes, Michal
|
|
Re: Potential C2 Kreutz comet 20211015
Robert Pickard
I am retracting my endorsement of this object. I am not 100% sure, and I do not want to jump to conclusions, Karl will decide who claims this comet. Regards, RP
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021, 11:52 PM Zesheng Yang <orionyzs@...> wrote: Thanks for the checking, really interesting object.
|
|
Re: New comet C2 2021-10-16
Robert Pickard
I can also confirm
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 10:19 AM Michał Biesiada <biesiadmichal@...> wrote: That's wonderful! Thank you so much!
|
|
Re: New comet C2 2021-10-16
Michał Biesiada
That's wonderful! Thank you so much!
Best wishes, Michal
|
|
Re: New comet C2 2021-10-16
Szymon Liwo
I can confirm this comet in C2. Congrats Michał !
Regards Szymon
|
|
Re: New comet C2 2021-10-16
Michał Biesiada
Further to my post:
927 970 12:24
Best wishes, Michal
|
|
Potential comet
Szymon Liwo
Hi All,
Potential comet:
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images. (0,0) Upper Left. 2021-10-16 Kreuz group comet.
1200 947 987 1212 936 978
Regards
Szymon Liwo
|
|
Re: Archival report
Peter Berrett
Forgot the film strip cheers Peter
On 16/10/2021 11:26 pm, Peter Berrett wrote:
|
|
Archival report
Peter Berrett
Hi Karl, Everyone
Here is an archival report of a very fast non-group comet. Image number 1 Images: C2; 1024x1024 images (0,0) Upper Left 20190308 0324 994 667 0417 904 621 0428 885 611 0438 869 603 0449 852 594 Distance per hour = 113.8633605022479 pixels cheers Peter
|
|
New comet C2 2021-10-16
Michał Biesiada
Hi All,
Hi Karl, New comet report: 21-10-16 Upper Left, 1024x1024, c2 959 996 1148 947 987 1200 937 980 1212 Best wishes, Michal
|
|
Re: Potential C2 Kreutz comet 20211015
Zesheng Yang
Thanks for the checking, really interesting object.
|
|
Re: Potential C2 Kreutz comet 20211015
Robert Pickard
Now that makes *perfect* sense Worachate, since I used the 10/15-17 plot to check the trajectory. I also checked more C3 images, and it looks like Masanori reported something that is real. I am willing to endorse the C3 report. If the C3 report checks out with Karl, Masanori will receive the credit for this discovery.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021, 11:41 PM Worachate <worachateb@...> wrote: If you look at my templates, it looks like that.
|
|
Re: Potential C2 Kreutz comet 20211015
Zesheng Yang
I can't see any points after 1730. Hard to distinguish the 1642-1730 points from noises.
|
|
Re: Potential C2 Kreutz comet 20211015
Zesheng Yang
I just realized x,y values can't be compared directly for C2 and C3. Waiting for official confirmation.
|
|
Re: Potential C2 Kreutz comet 20211015
Worachate
If you look at my templates, it looks like that.
I think placement of the plot may be a little off. Noticed it for a long time but too lazy to fix it. Worachate
|
|
Re: Potential C2 Kreutz comet 20211015
Robert Pickard
I am going to check his report again, I might have calculated incorrectly. The timing, does look right, but the location in C2, threw me off.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021, 11:34 PM Robert Pickard <rpickard1997@...> wrote:
|
|