|
Re: Non group Soho candidate report
Thanks Worachate.
I will have something definitely real to confirm in the next couple of minutes.
cheesr Peter
Thanks Worachate.
I will have something definitely real to confirm in the next couple of minutes.
cheesr Peter
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4961
·
|
|
Re: Non group Soho candidate report
I can't confirm it. The final reported position is definitely a star.
I can't confirm it. The final reported position is definitely a star.
|
By
Worachate
·
#4960
·
|
|
Re: Non group Soho candidate report
I will be interested to hear Worachate's opinion on this one.
cheers Peter
I will be interested to hear Worachate's opinion on this one.
cheers Peter
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4959
·
|
|
Re: Non group Soho candidate report
Too faint for me amongst the noise to confirm.
Too faint for me amongst the noise to confirm.
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4958
·
|
|
Re: Non group Soho candidate report
Oh goody, more action. Ill look.
Oh goody, more action. Ill look.
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4957
·
|
|
Non group Soho candidate report
Hi again
Website is still down unfortunately so here is a Non-group archive report.
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images
(0,0) Upper Left
20180301
0236 34 867
Hi again
Website is still down unfortunately so here is a Non-group archive report.
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images
(0,0) Upper Left
20180301
0236 34 867
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4956
·
|
|
Re: Recovery of Archival C2 Kreutz
I think I know what happened here. There was a mixup with the observed dates, so BAA is wrong, meaning I reported SOHO 3526. Oh well.
I think I know what happened here. There was a mixup with the observed dates, so BAA is wrong, meaning I reported SOHO 3526. Oh well.
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4955
·
|
|
Recovery of Archival C2 Kreutz
Difficult to determine if this is a numbered object or not, regardless it is definitely real.
Worachate reported a Kreutz for this date with the same times, but our coordinates do not match
Difficult to determine if this is a numbered object or not, regardless it is definitely real.
Worachate reported a Kreutz for this date with the same times, but our coordinates do not match
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4954
·
|
|
Website up, Today's finds posted there now
Hi all
The website is back up. For the convenience of Karl I have reported both my finds of today on the website.
If anyone cares to confirm them I would be grateful.
cheers Peter
Hi all
The website is back up. For the convenience of Karl I have reported both my finds of today on the website.
If anyone cares to confirm them I would be grateful.
cheers Peter
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4953
·
|
|
Re: yet another Archive Meyer comet report
Looks real to me.
I can get one more position:
0336 958 313
Object is consistent, but shows odd behavior. It follows my August Meyer chart perfectly.
I am actually leaning towards Meyer group just
Looks real to me.
I can get one more position:
0336 958 313
Object is consistent, but shows odd behavior. It follows my August Meyer chart perfectly.
I am actually leaning towards Meyer group just
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4952
·
|
|
Re: Archive Meyer comet report
I would also like to add that I cannot find anything saying this is a known object.
Congrats!
I would also like to add that I cannot find anything saying this is a known object.
Congrats!
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4951
·
|
|
Re: Archive Meyer comet report
I can confirm this comet. This is not a Meyer, and should be referred to as a non-group comet.
I can confirm this comet. This is not a Meyer, and should be referred to as a non-group comet.
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4950
·
|
|
yet another Archive Meyer comet report
Hello again
It is proving to be a bumper Fathers Day for me.
Here's another Meyer report. Its faint but I'm pretty sure its real.
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images
(0,0) Upper Left
20170807
0348
Hello again
It is proving to be a bumper Fathers Day for me.
Here's another Meyer report. Its faint but I'm pretty sure its real.
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images
(0,0) Upper Left
20170807
0348
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4949
·
|
|
Re: Archive Meyer comet report
Ill check it out
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4948
·
|
|
Archive Meyer comet report
Hi again everybody
I shall try again at a archive report! I feel more confident this has not been found before.
Here we go.
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images
(0,0)
Hi again everybody
I shall try again at a archive report! I feel more confident this has not been found before.
Here we go.
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images
(0,0)
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4947
·
|
|
SOHO X-Comet?
On 20090508, I see a obvious Kreutz-like object in one image, appearing in the footsteps of two prior comets. A huge data gap prevents positive identification, unfortunately.
Why I think this is a
On 20090508, I see a obvious Kreutz-like object in one image, appearing in the footsteps of two prior comets. A huge data gap prevents positive identification, unfortunately.
Why I think this is a
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4946
·
|
|
Re: Archive report
Nevertheless was worth reporting. Till next time,
Regards
RP
Nevertheless was worth reporting. Till next time,
Regards
RP
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4945
·
|
|
Re: Archive report
I stand corrected and withdraw the claim. Worachate reported this before . Its SOHO 3301.
cheers Peter
cheers Peter
I stand corrected and withdraw the claim. Worachate reported this before . Its SOHO 3301.
cheers Peter
cheers Peter
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4944
·
|
|
Re: Archive report
Hi all
If anyone needs to check whether this comet has been reported before the following links should be sufficient.
1. BAS website
Hi all
If anyone needs to check whether this comet has been reported before the following links should be sufficient.
1. BAS website
|
By
Peter Berrett
·
#4943
·
|
|
Re: Archive report
Cheers Peter, I checked your report and it is obviously real.
If it is new or previously reported, is to be determined.
Cheers Peter, I checked your report and it is obviously real.
If it is new or previously reported, is to be determined.
|
By
Robert Pickard
·
#4942
·
|